Roblox Corporation is facing a major legal challenge after Los Angeles County filed a lawsuit alleging the platform fails to protect children from predatory behavior. The case puts renewed scrutiny on how one of the world’s biggest online gaming communities handles safety for its youngest users.
What the Lawsuit Claims
On February 19, 2026, Los Angeles County filed a civil lawsuit accusing Roblox of “unfair and deceptive business practices” that endanger children. The complaint argues that:
-
Roblox’s design enables grooming, exploitation, and inappropriate interactions between adults and minors.
-
The company has not implemented adequate age verification or moderation tools to prevent such interactions.
-
Children are repeatedly exposed to sexually explicit content and predatory behavior despite public claims about safety.
-
Roblox allegedly prioritizes profits over meaningful safety protections.
County officials say the platform markets itself as a safe space but lacks effective measures to stop harmful contact between adults and children. In some cases, the lawsuit claims, bad actors have used Roblox chats to move conversations to other apps, where the exploitation can escalate.
Officials also point to the platform’s popularity: with over 151 million daily active users and more than 40 % under the age of 13, the county argues standard safeguards are insufficient to protect such a large base of vulnerable users.
The lawsuit seeks a court order requiring Roblox to strengthen its protections and could include civil penalties.
How Roblox Has Responded
In response, Roblox has publicly rejected the allegations and pledged to defend itself vigorously. In official statements and press comments, the company says:
-
Safety is a core priority, embedded in its platform design from the beginning.
-
It has developed advanced moderation tools, including AI-driven filters to detect harmful content and prevent inappropriate communication.
-
Users under age 13 face stricter default chat settings, and image sharing through chat is disabled entirely.
-
Roblox reports suspected exploitation to child protection authorities, including the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC).
-
The company is continuously updating safety features and collaborates with law enforcement and industry partners to combat abuse online.
Roblox stresses that “no system can be perfect, but our commitment to safety never ends,” affirming its intent to enhance protections while defending its reputation in court.
Broader Context and Ongoing Legal Pressure
This lawsuit from Los Angeles is not the first legal challenge Roblox has faced. Similar suits have been filed in multiple states, including Louisiana, Texas, Florida, Kentucky, and others, all centered on allegations of inadequate child safety measures.
For example:
-
In 2025, Louisiana filed a lawsuit claiming Roblox lacked effective safety protocols and warning systems to protect children from predators.
-
Attorneys general nationwide have also issued subpoenas or opened inquiries into how the company handles potential abuse.
These ongoing legal pressures highlight a broader debate over how digital platforms should balance user growth with robust safety practices, especially when underage users make up a large share of the audience.
What This Means for Parents and Guardians
Parents whose children use Roblox can take steps to improve safety:
-
Enable parental controls available within the platform to limit chat and interaction.
-
Regularly review friend lists and communication logs.
-
Talk with children about internet safety and boundaries, especially in social gaming environments.
Experts emphasize that while platform protections help, active parental supervision remains crucial in mitigating risks online.
Looking Ahead
With this lawsuit now underway in Los Angeles and others pending in multiple states, the outcome could influence how major gaming and social platforms approach child safety enforcement in the future. Ongoing developments are likely as courts and legislators examine emerging technology, moderation practices, and responsibilities of companies when minors are involved.
0 Comments